Table Town
TABLE TOWN
Tabletop community
Home · Hot games · Abstract Games
So Long Sucker
So long sucker: book front
So long sucker: page 5
So long sucker: page 359
So long sucker: page 360

So Long Sucker (1964)

Players
4
Best: 4
Playing time
20–20 min
Age
0+
6.23
Average rating
93
Ratings
1.83/5
Weight
#17673
BGG rank
Outside top 5,000
Alternate names:Fuck You, Buddy
Designer:John Nash, Mel Hausner, Lloyd S. Shapley, Martin Shubik
Publisher:(Self-Published) +1 more
Average rating, ratings count, weight and rank are sourced from BoardGameGeek (BGG).
Game DNA
  • This game: Strategy 7, Luck 4, Interaction 10, Complexity 3.7, Theme 5
Strategy7.0
Luck4.0
Interaction10.0
Complexity3.7
Theme5.0

This game's strategy, luck, interaction, complexity and theme.

EconomicNegotiationBookTeam-Based GamePlayer Elimination

Overview

Hausner, M., Nash, J. F., Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M., (1964), "'So Long Sucker,' A Four-Person Game". In M. Shubik (ed.) Game Theory and Related Approaches to Social Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

This game was devised in 1950 as a simple social game to model the behavior of people when forming coalitions. To make progress in the game you must form a coalition with at least one other player, but to actually win requires betraying your coalition. It is said that 'The four authors still occasionally talk to each other' and the initial tests of the game resulted in married couples going home from parties in separate cabs.

The objective is to be the last player with a stockpile of chips. (Each player starts with seven of a unique color.) Each play reduces your stockpile by one chip, and it is replenished through captures or gifts from other players. Players have some measure of control over who plays next, but captures either benefit another player or require that another player chooses to let you make a capture.

Players may form any non-binding agreements provided that all discussion is done at the table. Working together allows players to capture chips and force other players out of the game. In the end, one player must betray their coalitions to win.

The authors are also responsible for inventing the dollar auction and a great deal of economic theory.

Not available yet

Player reviews, retailers/pricing and rules videos have no real data source for this game yet.

View on BoardGameGeek ↗

Discussions

BGGView discussions on BoardGameGeek

Be the first to discuss

Reviews

No reviews yet
to write a review.